A 61-year-old woman is newly diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Her history includes hypertension treated with an ARB. She has no diabetes, heart failure, prior stroke or coronary disease. CrCl is 85 mL/min.
According to the CCS CHADS-65 algorithm, which is the most appropriate stroke prevention therapy?
- A.No antithrombotic therapy because she is under 65
- B.ASA 81 mg daily
- C.An oral anticoagulant, preferably a DOAC
- D.ASA 81 mg plus clopidogrel 75 mg daily
- E.Warfarin, because it is preferred for new starts
Show answer and explanationHide answer
Answer: C
She is under 65, so the next step asks about CHADS2 risk factors. Hypertension is one of them, which makes her eligible for an oral anticoagulant, and Canadian guidance prefers a DOAC over warfarin for nonvalvular AF.
Why the other options are wrong
- A:Being under 65 only leads to no therapy if she also has none of the CHADS2 risk factors; she has hypertension.
- B:ASA is reserved for patients with coronary or arterial disease and no other indication for an OAC; it is not adequate stroke prevention in AF.
- D:Dual antiplatelet therapy is less effective than anticoagulation for AF stroke prevention and still carries meaningful bleeding risk.
- E:DOACs are preferred over warfarin unless she had a mechanical valve or moderate to severe mitral stenosis.
Reference: CCS/CHRS Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation (2020)